New batsman stepping on the field of play

[Mayur Wankhade Deshmukh]

have you noticed every time after the fall of wicket that which batsman had step on the field of play ?

what is you practice to take care of Law 2.10 ? kindly share your views

[gooders]

I'm sorry, but I cannot see the point you are trying to make. Could you please explain. 2.10 is surely a statement of fact as to when a batsman's innings commences. So long as it is not a batsman who has been acting as a runner, I cannot see any reason to get concerned.

[Mayur Wankhade Deshmukh]

@ gooders : i meant, what if you had not paid attention to which batsmen had step first and before you come to know, captain or coach sends another one by calling first batsman back.

one could have prevented this, if he would have made sure which batsmen had first step on the field at fall of every wicket.

Sending another batsman once new batsman first steps onto field is not permitted since new batsman's innings commenced as soon he step on the field.

[sillypoint]

I think you have answered your own question. This is just another of the many details the umpires should pay attention to in the course of a match.

I once had a wicket fall when drinks were due, so we took the drinks break immediately. As we headed towards the drinks I noticed a batsman padded up and ready, but when play resumed a different batsman came out. In this case the change was permissible because Time had been called (ref Law 2.10).

[Mayur Wankhade Deshmukh]

@ sillypoint : completely agree with. In my starting days, I missed on many occasions that which new batsman is stepping on to the field. But with more matches I become mature about this law and now taking care every time at every fall of wicket.