moosa
Regular Contributor
Posts: 20
|
Post by moosa on Jul 26, 2006 13:36:40 GMT
if a fielder is injured on the field of play and leaves the field and comes after one hour does he have to remain in the field of play for 1 hour before he can bowl or can he bowl directly after entering the field
|
|
|
|
Post by Acumen on Jul 26, 2006 20:58:54 GMT
Moosa
May I suggest you study Tom Smith's Cricket Umpiring & Scoring in a little more detail before posting any more basic questions?
Alternatively, reply privately to me telling me your town and I will try to put you in touch with your local instructor.
|
|
moosa
Regular Contributor
Posts: 20
|
Post by moosa on Jul 27, 2006 13:46:55 GMT
sir this question for me the confusion if a fielder leaves the field for any other reason then he must stay on the field for 1 hour before he can bowl but for a physical injury does he have to stay on the field for 1 hour before he can bowl. i stay in india in the state of karnataka city bangalore from where anil kumble and rahul dravid come
|
|
|
|
Post by Acumen on Jul 27, 2006 14:59:30 GMT
I appreciate that English is not your first language and that MCC have not perhaps written the Laws in the simplest language.
Law 2.5(c) is quite clear that "... is absent for 15 minutes or longer, he shall not be permitted ..." There iss no mention of any exception for injury or any other reason. This may seem unfair, especially in short matches but that is MCC Law.
Are there umpires in India who are making different rulings?
|
|
moosa
Regular Contributor
Posts: 20
|
Post by moosa on Jul 27, 2006 17:15:00 GMT
THE UMPIRES INDIA ARE NOT MAKING DIFFERENT RULINGS THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANSWER COLIN PEARSON SIR ARE YOU GOING TO PUT ME IN TOUCH WITH MY LOCAL INSTRUCTOR FROM BANGALORE. I HAVE DONE THE UMPIRING EXAM IN BANGALORE
|
|
moosa
Regular Contributor
Posts: 20
|
Post by moosa on Jul 28, 2006 6:55:26 GMT
sir according to our big umpires if a fielder is injured in a case where he his bleeding then he does not have to stay in the field for that time he was outside before he can bowl this is there interpratation of law 2.5
|
|
|
|
Post by Acumen on Jul 28, 2006 16:02:39 GMT
I guess that your local cricketing authorities have made a special ruling on this - similar to the blood substitute in Rugby Football. It does seem a sensible health precaution.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrsinghIndia on Aug 16, 2006 18:35:28 GMT
I think Moosa is misled by the ICC playing condition that provides for the 15 min & over ( over 8 min) bar not being applicable to a fielder who has suffered an injury owing to an external blow & as a result has to leave the field, as opposed to one who has sustained an internal injury such as a pulled muscle or suffers from other illness. This regulation is made applicable in first class cricket in India and maybe to local cricket in Bangalore.
The basic Laws, of course, do not make any distinction.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashwinisawal on Nov 17, 2007 6:03:32 GMT
According to the Ranji Trophy Playing Conditions and that of Test and One Day Internationals.
A player who get injured externally (no need for him to bleed it can be any form of EXTERNAL injury) at any time after Toss, can come back on field during that inning and can blow the next over or part of the current over.
Even when he is absent from the field for more than 8 mins (8 mins and not 15 mins absence is time frame according to the international playing conditions as stipulated by ICC)
This is the playing condition and not the MCC Law.
|
|
