|
Post by rajeshpaul on Jun 19, 2013 19:06:05 GMT
Case 1- After Playing a ball defensively a batsman sees the ball slowly moving towards his wicket he again hits the ball to guard his wicket and complete 1 run.What will be the further occurence?
Case 2- If in the above case after 1 run has been completed and the ball is thrown to the wicket-keeper and he misfields Can they run another run?
|
|
|
Post by gooders on Jun 19, 2013 21:16:19 GMT
What is your understanding of the conditions laid down in Law 34. I would suggest you read this, and discuss the ramifications with your instructor at your next meeting.
|
|
|
Post by sillypoint on Jun 30, 2013 2:27:37 GMT
Under the present Law 34 runs are only allowed if the result from overthrows (34.4.b). However, I believe that the soon to be released 2013 code will change this and no runs will be allowed at all from a ball lawfully struck more than once. When I see it in print I will give three cheers!
|
|
|
Post by jaybee on Jun 30, 2013 7:19:19 GMT
... I believe that the soon to be released 2013 code will change this and no runs will be allowed at all from a ball lawfully struck more than once. When I see it in print I will give three cheers! That's one point of view. I presume that the change in the Law would not protect a batsman mistakenly going for a run in this situation, so he could be run out. Following on from this, if a batsman defends his wicket and doesn't attempt a run, why should he not benefit from a wild throw which would go for 'buzzers'?
|
|
|
Post by sillypoint on Jun 30, 2013 13:03:17 GMT
Even under the present Law 34 this is illogical. The batsman is allowed a second or subsequent strike of the ball "solely in order to guard his wicket". Since this is the ONLY purpose for this action it makes sense that no further benefit should be allowed to the batsman. As for the argument that the batting side should be allowed to benefit from a wild throw, no such provision is made in the case where leg byes are to be disallowed (26.3). From what I have heard, the law makers have finally come around to this point of view the convoluted two and a bit pages of law (34.4 and 34.5) covering what was always a highly unlikely set of circumstances.
As to the first point made by jaybee, I believe the logic of Law 26.3 will now be applied to Law 34; thus the batsmen will be in danger of being run out if they attempt to run, but once they complete one run dead ball will be called and they will be sent back.
|
|