Wicket-keeper's Helmet

[jaybee]

Another small point - when is a young keeper standing / not standing up to the stumps?
Many youngsters stand about a pace and a bit back from the stumps to a slow bowler. In a recent match a slow bowler came on and the (pretty competent) junior keeper wasn't wearing a helmet. I was at the bowler's end and a member of the batting side was filling in at striker's end.
The keeper seemed to be standing in this 'half-mast' position so I asked him about his helmet to which he reponded he wasn't standing up. I took the view that it was OK as he had worn a helmet at other times and I thought that he was:

• not able to reach the stumps without moving further forward; and:
• out of reach of the bat if the striker had swung right round.

I still think that this is about the right balance for safety's sake, but what do others think? Should I have insisted on a helmet (he wore one later to another bowler when he stood closer)?
Of course it also underlines the need to have someone suitable at both ends.

[blackbeard]

What if little Johnny's parents sue you when he is hit in the face and is permanently disfigured, you will be held responsible as you did not insist on a helmet. Standing up is close to the stumps, standing back is at least 5 yards or more.
It is irrelevant whether or not he could reach the stumps, if he is within 5 yards he is up?

Thats what I teach, if the keeper complains or the coach i explain the health and safety of the players is my concern, if you want him not to wear a helmet please sign a disclaimer absolving me of all responsibility, this usually shuts them up. You will not be covered by insurance if you are seen to be negligent. This may sound harsh, but can you afford to be sued and lose your house?

[Number 6]

I agree with Blackbeard. 5 yards minimum.